I'm not including some of the beautiful historical curved swords like the Talwar, Yataghan or Shamshir, because I wanted to show that there are even more unusual weapons that would make visually striking arms in a Conan movie.
Well, obviously, I wouldn't be making this movie at all, but just because I'm stunned by the mere idea of a Double Bladed Parallel Scimitar, I think it's worth exploring the more exotic blades of the East which were actually used.
The legendary weapon of the Muslim leader Ali ibn Abi Talib, how can you not love a sword with a blade like a forked Serpent's Tongue? It would certainly tie in nicely to Set, or some other similarly serpentine deity. Of course, the biggest problem with its inclusion would be that it's a holy symbol of Islam, so it probably wouldn't be chosen. I just included it on the list because I think it's a fantastic design.
It's quite clear that the Indians are some of the most sadistically inventive warriors in history: not content with creating awesome swords, they've decided punching just wasn't bloody enough. No, they had to combine the action of stabbing with punching, to create a whole new verb involving this demoniac weapon. Best of all, there were three-bladed variants, where you had grizzled, blood-crazed warriors charging at their enemies with what amount to steel claws. That's right, Wolverine was beaten to it by the Indians.
Essentially, a whip sword. This would be unlike just about any other weapon I've seen in a fantasy film. While the lethality of the blade doesn't seem to be particularly effective against an armoured opponent, it's deadly against unarmoured ones. It requires tremendous skill to use without getting yourself killed, which just adds to its mystique. Kind of like a lightsaber, come to think of it.
Now here's a bit of a twist, since this technically isn't a sword: however, the idea of a shield affixed with two pointy things is just too great to resist. This was one of a variety of weapons carried by nominally non-violent holy men for self-defense purposes: they may not be able to carry traditional weapons, but there's nothing against carrying animal horns. Put two and two together...
The Katar's bigger, angrier, choppier brother. If I had it my way, this would be Khalar's weapon. Just think: back in Mughal India, there were people running about hacking other people's heads and limbs off with these things. Like Indian T-1000s. While they appear to be largely anti-cavalry weapons, they can also be used in old-fashioned foot combat. Indeed, one of the coolest aspects of the sword is their flexibility allows them to be worn around the waist, like a belt. Imagine Khalar Zym, seemingly unarmed, whipping off his belt an brandishing it as a weapon.
And just for fun, let's see some of those swords in action. Obviously these videos are purely display-oriented, and probably a good deal more elaborate and flashy than in an actual battle context, but it does show how nimble and versatile they are:
*Thanks to Rajit for the clarification.
It's a bit different from your usual sort of post, but I enjoyed it immensely. I'm especially intrigued by the Zulfiqar - the idea of thematically modifying a blade has potential. Sadly, my opinion of the Urumi is forever tarnished by my introduction to it via the Roman VS Rajput episode of 'Deadliest Warrior'. Them's the breaks, I suppose.ReplyDelete
in general, oriental swords are curved sabers and western ones straight?ReplyDelete
Anonymous: In general, you're correct. That was certainly Howard's view (and JRRT's as well, the swords of the LotR movies notwithstanding). Straight swords were the default design across the ancient and post-Roman world up until around the time of the Mongol Empire. Before then, swords in the Muslim world were usually straight. The Mongol sabre revolutionized sword design in Islam, China and Japan.ReplyDelete
In the West, you did have ancient weapons like the falcata and makaira (neither widely used), but curved blades fell out of favor in the Roman and post-Roman periods. The medieval falcion would appear to have been ultimately derived from the Mongol sabre.
It's a bit different from your usual sort of post, but I enjoyed it immensely.ReplyDelete
Cheers, T! I might do more of this ilk occasionally, if I come across a subject like it.
I'm especially intrigued by the Zulfiqar - the idea of thematically modifying a blade has potential.
Indeed it does!
Sadly, my opinion of the Urumi is forever tarnished by my introduction to it via the Roman VS Rajput episode of 'Deadliest Warrior'. Them's the breaks, I suppose.
The good thing about that episode is they got a genuine Maratha to demonstrate it instead of the stuntmen-masquerading-as-historians they usually go with. Still, the stabby bits of Deadliest Warrior are hard to mess up, since it's difficult not to enjoy someone hacking a ballistic gel torso to pieces.
I'm half expecting them to just throw all pretences of historical verisimilitude to the wind, and start using movie characters. "Kurgan. Kuwabatake Sanjuro. WHO. IS. DEADLIEST?"
in general, oriental swords are curved sabers and western ones straight?
Can't really add anything to Deuce's response (thanks dude!)
really man,i thought thy my country was a wimp at fighting....but now you opened my eyes......wowReplyDelete
Which country is that, voldra?ReplyDelete
As for the Urumi...its not a weapon of the Maratha....it was a weapon developed and used in Kerala, India...It was used in the martial art of Kalari....if you want a genuine demonstration of the weapon, you need to get a student of Kalari showing how it is used, not by a Marathi....big difference...ReplyDelete
Thanks for the clarification, Timmy: I wasn't aware of the deeper history of the Urumi. Now, if I could find a video of a Kalari using an Urumi...ReplyDelete
What should the blades of Almuric look like?ReplyDelete
Thid Is Regarding Adya-Kathi/Odi-Kathi.
This For Your Information
The "Adya"-Means "Big" Or "First" Depending Pronunciation in Coorg/Kodava Language. Also Called "Odi-Kathi" It Purely Belongs To Coorg/Kodagu Not Malbar.
I Am A Coorg/Kodava
Ah, thank you kindly for the clarification, Rajit! As you can probably tell, this isn't my first, second, third or fourth language, so I appreciate corrections like this.Delete