I'm not sure if he's that Tom Shippey, but since that Tom Shippey is noted to write book reviews for the Wall Street Journal, it's a safe bet he is.
Well... brace yourselves, folks.
It doesn't start well.
The father of "sword- and- sorcery" fiction was Robert E. Howard (1906–36), an unlikely creator for such a wide-ranging and adventurous form. He lived all his short life in small-town Texas...
Argh.
...and shot himself at age 30, seemingly out of depression over his mother's incurable illness.
Again this desire to start off with the suicide. How many reviews of London's work start off with his death? Or Ambrose Bierce's mysterious disappearance? Not many. Yet people still seem to start off with that. And of course, the reasons for the suicide are nowhere near as clear as "depression over his mother's incurable illness." Howard scholars still can't really agree on why Howard shot himself. Some believe it was a fit of madness over the loss of his mother, others believe Howard had contemplated it before - as young as when he was a teenager. It simply isn't as simple as "seemingly out of depression over his mother's incurable illness," and it's disingenuous to present it as if it was the prevailing view, even "seemingly."
Between 1924 and 1936, however, he published a prodigious amount of fiction (around three million words) in the era's pulp magazines. He wrote boxing stories, horror stories, Westerns and historical romances of the sort collected in "Sword Woman and Other Historical Adventures." He was paid a penny a line, if he was lucky.
Good man, you've done your homework here.
His great creation was Conan the Barbarian, who debuted in Weird Tales magazine in 1932 and was the hero of 20 Howard stories. Conan is obvious masculine wish-fulfillment. Strong and fierce, he overcomes any physical challenge. Dump him unconscious on the deck of a slave-galley, and he soon wakes up, kicks the captain into the scuppers, seizes an ax, chops free the slaves and is the captain of his own pirate ship. Shackle him to a wall in a lightless, monster-haunted dungeon, and a harem maiden who has fallen in love with him will come by carrying keys and a weapon. Only magic can threaten him, and Conan has a sharp answer to sorcerers.
Again with the "masculine wish-fulfilment." If Conan can overcome any physical challenge, how come he gets... well, beaten in physical challenges? If only magic can threaten him, how is it he can be nearly killed by mere mortals? Yes, it's clear that Conan is an indomitable fellow, but that doesn't translate to some kind of ridiculous Mary Sue who overcomes any situation on his own, which is pretty much the impression Shippey gives here. Even a situation where Conan is, quite patently, not able to do things on his own - Zenobia's aid - is somehow spun as an example of Conan overcoming all challenges! How does that even work?
(Also, he was the hero of 21 stories, unless Shippey's excluding The Hour of the Dragon as a novel)
Other authors just kept on writing Conan stories. In the 1960s and '70s, various publishing houses brought out more than 20 volumes of them, mixing Howard stories with new works by others (as well as Howard fragments completed by others). Which were which was not always clear, but the books sold so well that in the '80s and '90s Tor brought out 40 new Conan titles. Some were by young authors jump-starting a career, notably Robert Jordan, others by established authors like Harry Turtledove, doing homage to an idol of their youth. Some were good, some not, but they weren't the real thing.
Accordingly, Ballantine provided an essential corrective, bringing out a three- volume illustrated edition of Howard's Conan stories only. "The Coming of Conan the Cimmerian," "The Conquering Sword of Conan" and "The Bloody Crown of Conan" (2003–05) present the works in the order they were written. Each has scholarly commentary, edited drafts and Howard's own map and essay on his fictional, pre-Ice Age "Hyborian Age."
Yet Conan formed barely 10% of Howard's output. For the rest, the guide is the Ballantine two-volume sampler, "The Best of Robert E. Howard" (2007). These volumes contain another 50-plus items, including stories featuring Kull of Atlantis, Sailor Steve Costigan, Solomon Kane the Puritan Avenger and stories linked to the "Cthulhu mythos" of H.P. Lovecraft, Howard's friend and fellow Weird Tales contributor.
Well, good to see he knows what's what regarding the pastiches and Conan's place in Howard's literary canon A shame he didn't mention the fact that Kull, Kane and the horror stories all have their own Del Rey volumes, but presumably he uses the samplers for expediency.
Asking where authors get their ideas from is a futile occupation (they come out of their heads). But it might be possible to figure out where Howard, out there in rural 1920s Texas, got his scenarios from. Lovecraft made a suggestive remark when he criticized Howard for using names that were too close to real-world myth: Asgard, Vanaheim, Cimmeria, Zingara, Acheron, Stygia, Kush. Howard had been reading Bulfinch's "Mythology" but must have taken in some medieval and classical history too.
Not exactly groundbreaking insight here - "hmm, so if the people of Asgard and Vanaheim are the antediluvian ancestors of the Norse peoples - say, do you think Howard intended the names to be close to real-world myth, as a way to further tie his lost Hyborian Age to modern history?" But hey, at least it's acknowledging that Howard didn't just pull things out of a hat.
This historical interest shows up in "Sword Woman and Other Historical Adventures"—an additional 20-plus Howard items, illustrated by John Watkiss, in settings from 11th-century Ireland (Gaels and Vikings) to 16th-century France ("The Three Musketeers" on speed and steroids). In between are Crusaders and Saracens, Cossacks and Corsairs, Tatars and Franks. All are drawn—as Scott Oden's introduction establishes beyond doubt—from the surprising amount of pop history available to a Depression-era autodidact in a small town. Howard consistently boosted barbarism over civilization, but his own life shows clearly the effects of trickle-down culture.
Hmm, does barbarism get boosted over civilization in his historical stories, though? Most of the historical stories consist of barbarians fighting other barbarians, or civilizations fighting other civilizations, and when barbarism gets boosted, it's usually on an individual level. Cormac's tough because he was raised among shock-headed kerns, and whatnot. The most notable cases of barbarians fighting civilization in Sword Woman and Other Historical Adventures are the ones where history proved the barbarians the victors - such as the Timurids in "Lord of Samarcand," though I suppose they may be pushing the definition of barbarians.
The Hyborian Age barbarians were distilled, potent avatars of barbarism: real barbarians are too disorganized, proud and fickle to be able to resist the onset of a powerful civilization, though they would fight bravely. If one looks at real history, then one is faced with dozens of occasions where the barbarians could have trounced the opposition, if they stopped fighting among themselves and united against a common foe. Howard knew this well. While barbarism may be the natural state of mankind, of course, that doesn't mean that it is a good natural state.
The title story's heroine, red-haired Agnes of France, surprisingly proves that while Howard never stopped being macho, he wasn't restrictively masculine. Weird Tales featured other warlike heroines in the 1930s, notably Catherine L. Moore's Jirel of Joiry. But what Howard had—maybe even more than Edgar Rice Burroughs, who created "Tarzan of the Apes" around the same time—was copiousness of invention. There's a twist on every page, a new idea every other story. Temples of forgotten cults deep in the jungle, reanimated sorcerers, naked beauties offering immortality—his imitators have made some of these clichés, but Howard pioneered the lost-world map and the clash of cultures. The clichés wouldn't have had the imitators if they weren't potent.
Howard died young but cast a long shadow. He did much to create a decisively American romantic tradition. Those vanished pulp magazines—Weird Tales, Unknown, even Magic Carpet Magazine—how they fed the imagination! Is it videogames, now, that do that job?
Well, by Jove, that's a damn good ending to a problematic, but overall worthy article. Yes, one could argue whether Howard truly pioneered those elements, and one could ask who were those other warlike heroines that apparently stalked the halls of Weird Tales in the 1930s (since I can recall Moore and Howard's creations and... I'm sure there's some pulp expert out there who can happily point to those warrior women by other authors, so please do), but really, these are nitpicks. Here is Tom Shippey, one of the most respected and venerated Tolkien scholars, talking up Robert E. Howard.
That, good friends, is excellent.
Hi Al, I appreciate the link. Yes, some problems with the article (especially leading with the suicide bit), but nevertheless it's a review of Robert E. Howard's work in the Wall Street Journal. By Tom Shippey. Excellent!
ReplyDelete*Guitar riff*
ReplyDeleteAs for the "Mary Sue" allegation, more fodder for the Newcomer's Guide to REH, eh?
ReplyDeleteJust read the review, and I'm inclined to give Shippey a break, here, for a few reason: one, he obviously "get" Howard and clearly has read some ancillary material on the man--even if it's only the introductions. But that's enough, and far more than most. Yeah, he got some of the biographical particulars wrong, but there doesn't seem to be any malice in what he recounts. Note the word "apparantly" and the absence of the phrase "to whom he was excessively devoted" when discussing his suicide. His comments on barbarism again, would appear to be more of a memory lapse than a misreading of the text. My adversary, Steve Allsup, would undoubtedly chafe at the notion of a Tolkien scholar dropping Sailor Steve Costigan and the boxing stories into Howard's list of accomplishments ahead of his other genres, but to me, that's as it should be.
ReplyDeleteAll in all, I'd count Shippey as a friend of REH studies, for the reasons I've mentioned above.
As for the "Mary Sue" allegation, more fodder for the Newcomer's Guide to REH, eh?
ReplyDeleteA while back, I put Conan through the online Mary Sue Litmus Test, and did a big spiel on how there's a difference between someone who happens to be good at lots of things, and a Mary Sue, citing examples of historical polymaths. It might well be transported to the Newcomer's Guide.
Just read the review, and I'm inclined to give Shippey a break, here, for a few reason: one, he obviously "get" Howard and clearly has read some ancillary material on the man--even if it's only the introductions.
Given my high opinion of the man's Tolkien scholarship, I was inclined to do the same, though I still really wince at some of the inaccuracies. Perhaps it's because he's a renowned, erudite Tolkien scholar I expected more from him.
Note the word "apparantly" and the absence of the phrase "to whom he was excessively devoted" when discussing his suicide.
Even with the use of "apparently" and the lack of "to whom he was excessively devoted," the overall impression is that Howard killed himself over his mother's illness. It might not have been malicious on Shippey's part, but it's still an unfortunate perpetuation.
Ah well, in the end, I agree he deserves the benefit of the doubt here. Hence how I went with Good Scot/Bad Scot.
who is Mary Sue?
ReplyDeletemore things I have a little mess with the publishers in the 2000's of Howard...
Wandering star- the first two hardcovers of Conan by Howard, isn't it?
Del Rey- the third in hardcover and all the three in paperback?
now he talks about Ballantine, and what were the publishers of the two volumes of the best? and the volumes of Bran Mak Morn, Solomon Kane, Dark Agnes...? is it Del Rey a subsidiary of Ballantine?
I hope you can clear me all that mess...
do you think Howard intended the names to be close to real-world myth, as a way to further tie his lost Hyborian Age to modern history?
don't you think so? I don't remember where I read that but some scholar or blogger said that Howard created Conan to write historical adventures without to doing the work of documentation
suicide theme, I have been a lot of time, before I discovered the cimmerian or silver key or this blog thinking that the suicide was motivated by the illness of his mother, how can be the scholarship being so sure it wasn't that the cause?
Francisco
Total agreement on how reviewers always hit on the REH's suicide. Why point that out up-front unless it's meant to denigrate? I don't see many articles that do the same to Hemingway, or the less certain but self-destructive habits of other writers who drank or drugged themselves to death's door.
ReplyDeleteAnd it is true Conan was hard to kill, but not untouchable.
I'll have to read up on the Mary Sue litmus test.
Left a comment on conan.com and WSJ that I'll paste here:
Like Vincent van Gogh, Robert E. Howard was genius at his vocation. Both men had about a ten year run of incredible production -- then sadly, over.
As for the point about video games taking over the imagination of would-be readers, undoubtedly there'd be more readers if video games weren't around. However, the advent of the e-readers can provide a bridge for the gadget-obsessed video lovers to find their way back to the written word, and unleash facets of their own imagination that exceed the limits of a team of programmers and content-developers. To some degree the writer does this, but the reader's mind helps flesh out the imagery, not a computer. There's some publishers going a step further and injecting short films into the e-readers, which I think is more a step backward but may further entice reluctant readers.
In the end gamers may be shocked at the power of their own imaginations, once untethered from the video, and Robert E. Howard has entire worlds waiting for them.
Mark,
ReplyDeleteHave you considered emailing him or posting a comment at the WSJ (if possible) praising the good and gently pointing out the failings of the short piece? When I quickly read his piece, I got the impression that it wasn't based on careful analysis but rather casual observations off his memory. Since you are a published author and authority on REH, I suggested you but there are many others who could add the needed corrective, I suppose. I sense that he, Shippey, would be receptive.
GMW
Despite the flaws in the article, I think its a great step in the right direction to even have some one like Tom Shippey be discussing Howard.. and in an actual real live newspaper for that matter.. it's just a pity that it took 11 volumes of the Del Rey set to get to this place.. when it looks very likely we won't be getting a 12th.
ReplyDeletewho is Mary Sue?
ReplyDeleteIn short, Mary Sue is the name given to a character who is perfect in every way, suffering no flaws, experiencing no hardship, where everyone loves her except the villains, and acts as little more than a wish-fulfillment fantasy. Conan is not one of these.
more things I have a little mess with the publishers in the 2000's of Howard...
Wandering star- the first two hardcovers of Conan by Howard, isn't it?
Del Rey- the third in hardcover and all the three in paperback?
now he talks about Ballantine, and what were the publishers of the two volumes of the best? and the volumes of Bran Mak Morn, Solomon Kane, Dark Agnes...? is it Del Rey a subsidiary of Ballantine?
Del Rey appears to be an imprint/subsidiary of Ballantine, yes.
don't you think so? I don't remember where I read that but some scholar or blogger said that Howard created Conan to write historical adventures without to doing the work of documentation
That is true, but I also think it's beyond question that Howard fully intended to use mythical/historical names as a way to tie in the Hyborian Age to modern times.
suicide theme, I have been a lot of time, before I discovered the cimmerian or silver key or this blog thinking that the suicide was motivated by the illness of his mother, how can be the scholarship being so sure it wasn't that the cause?
We can't be sure, really: however, over the years the idea that Howard commit suicide specifically over grief, or the inability to cope without his mother's presence, has taken hold. Howard scholars take issue with that conclusion precisely because we can't know if that was the case or not, and there's no correct answer.
Total agreement on how reviewers always hit on the REH's suicide. Why point that out up-front unless it's meant to denigrate? I don't see many articles that do the same to Hemingway, or the less certain but self-destructive habits of other writers who drank or drugged themselves to death's door.
Indeed, John. Great comment, by the way.
Despite the flaws in the article, I think its a great step in the right direction to even have some one like Tom Shippey be discussing Howard.. and in an actual real live newspaper for that matter.. it's just a pity that it took 11 volumes of the Del Rey set to get to this place.. when it looks very likely we won't be getting a 12th.
It is regrettable. A Shippey article ten years ago when the Wandering Stars and first Del Reys were out would've been just the ticket.
Thanks for the Mary Sue definition. No, Conan is definitely not a Mary Sue, lol.
ReplyDeleteCool blog, Al. I miss the Cimmerian but will cruise here regularly.
Cheers, John. I miss the Cimmerian too, but as long as Brian, Leo, Barbara and the gang keep posting on their various blogs, its spirit will live on.
ReplyDelete