Brad the Cinema Snob, one of my new favourite internet personalities, wasn't a fan either.
Now, I've only caught a few bits of the animated series the film is based on, but what I've seen looked not bad. Unfortunately, as is so depressingly common, the film is not. The film made many seemingly pointless changes to the beloved show's story, condensing all the plot into one, eliminating a lot of character development and background material. The racial alterations are notorious. To add insult to injury, it isn't even a good film: on the contrary, comparisons to Battlefield Earth and Dragon Wars (which has a special level in my personal circle of hell by virtue of the fact that it should be impossible and illegal to make a story about an epic battle between dragons and dinosaurs boring) are rife. So, in terms of doing justice to the source material, The Last Airbender has failed utterly.
And yet, in terms of narrative... This is still more faithful to the source material than the Conan film is going to be.
In fact, it's pretty much a condensed version of the first season. Although there are still a ludicrous number of discrepancies and inaccuracies, it's still vaguely recognizable as an adaptation. A horrible adaptation, but an adaptation nonetheless.
Here's the synopsis of the television show:
In a lost age the world is divided into four equal powers: Water Tribe, Earth Kingdom, Fire Nation, and Air Nomads. In each nation there's a group of gifted people known as Benders who have the ability to manipulate their native element using martial arts and elemental magic. For thousands of years the nations lived together peacefully. But then disaster struck. The young ruler of the Fire Nation, Fire Lord Sozin, began a war of world conquest. The only one who could have prevented it was the Avatar. The Avatar is the human incarnation of the Spirit of the World, he alone can master bending all four elements. But, just when he was needed most, he disappeared. Now, 100 years later, a young Waterbender named Katara and her older brother Sokka stumble upon the long lost Avatar, Aang, who was encased in an iceberg for 100 years. Now, they must help Aang master all four elements before summer when Sozin's grandson Fire Lord Ozai will use a comet to deal one last deadly strike against the other nations and claim a Fire Nation victory. But, all that is easier said than done with the Fire Lord's determined and hot-tempered son, Prince Zuko, hot on their trail.
And here's the synopsis of the film:
The world is divided into four kingdoms, each represented by the element they harness, and peace has lasted throughout the realms of Water, Air, Earth, and Fire under the supervision of the Avatar, a link to the spirit world and the only being capable of mastering the use of all four elements. When young Avatar Aang disappears, the Fire Nation launches an attack to eradicate all members of the Air Nomads to prevent interference in their future plans for world domination. 100 years pass and current Fire Lord Ozai continues to conquer and imprison anyone with elemental "bending" abilities in the Earth and Water Kingdoms, while siblings Katara and Sokka from a Southern Water Tribe find a mysterious boy trapped beneath the ice outside their village. Upon rescuing him, he reveals himself to be Aang, Avatar and last of the Air Nomads. Swearing to protect the Avatar, Katara and Sokka journey with him to the Northern Water Kingdom in his quest to master "Waterbending" and eventually fulfill his destiny of once again restoring peace to the world. But as they inch nearer to their goal, the group must evade Prince Zuko, the exiled son of Lord Ozai, Commander Zhao, the Fire Nation's military leader, and the tyrannical onslaught of the evil Fire Lord himself.
See, that's pretty much close, isn't it? If The Last Airbender was as unfaithful as Conan is, this is what the plot synopsis would be:
Once, the earth was ruled by the Avatars, celestial beings which has dominion over the five elements: Solid, Liquid, Gas, Plasma and Soul. A thousand years ago, an Avatar/Human hybrid race with control over each of those elements usurped the rule of the Avatars, and put their leader in an eternal prison somewhere in the wilderness. These beings - the Benders - forged four empires over the spheres of the earth, reigning as gods over the oppressed masses. The Air Benders ruled the skies from airships, planes and floating fortresses; the Rock Benders were masters of the land on mechanical walking cities; the Sea Benders commanded the seas in their submarines and ships, and the Flame Benders reigned over the magma of the underworld. However, the empires started to fight among themselves, and the Air Benders were wiped out in a great civil war, believed extinct.
However, one Air Bender remains: a surly, sarcastic rogue named Aang, who is unaware of his evil origins. Mistika, a member of the human rebels against the despotic Benders, captures Aang, and brings him to the rebel stronghold: the rebel leader, Dordrumu, decides to use him to destroy the remaining Benders, in a quest to find the Avatar. Aang, Mistika, Dordrumu and wacky robot sidekick Kobalak must search the world before the evil Stone, Ice and Flame Benders discover them - but will Aang do the right thing, or will he join his brethren as evil overlord of the skies?
I really can't make it any clearer. M. Knight Shyamalan's heinous "adaptation" of one of the most popular and well-received animations of the last ten years is still closer to the source material than "Conan" is. And it has - of this writing - a miserable 8% on Rotten Tomatoes. Now, I'm sure someone will point out "but Al, maybe Hood and Lobel have changed the script into something that IS closer to the Howard stories, and while we won't get one that's close in letter, maybe we'll get one closer in spirit."
No. It's not happening. And do you know why? Because as long as this is the plot synopsis of the film:
The tale of Conan the Cimmerian and his adventures across the continent of Hyboria on a quest to avenge the murder of his father and the slaughter of his village.
It cannot be remotely faithful to Robert E. Howard's Conan. It's as simple as that.
There is no way one can reconcile the idea of Conan wandering the world in a quest for vengeance without completely ignoring the stories and Howard's notes in letters. No amount of rewriting will change this.
This is what Howard said about Conan's "origin," or rather, his first excursions out of Cimmeria:
There was the space of about a year between Vanarium and his entrance into the thief-city of Zamora. During this time he returned to the northern territories of his tribe, and made his first journey beyond the boundaries of Cimmeria. This, strange to say, was north instead of south. Why or how, I am not certain, but he spent some months among a tribe of the Aesir, fighting with the Vanir and the Hyperboreans, and developing a hate for the latter which lasted all his life and later affected his policies as king of Aquilonia. Captured by them, he escaped southward and came into Zamora in time to make his debut in print.
- Letter to P.S. Miller, 10th March, 1936
There's no way of supporting Conan going to Khor Khala (wherever the hell it is, it's clearly in a desert, meaning Conan must go south, not north) instead of going to Asgard - Hyperborea - Zamora, and say that it's "faithful to Howard." That's like saying the Fellowship getting to Mordor by going west to the Grey Havens, taking a boat down the coast, docking at Balfalas, going overland through Harondor, and traversing Nurn is "faithful to Tolkien." Completely contradicting what Howard said does not equate to fidelity, in my mind.
The only way a story about Conan seeking revenge for the murder of his parents and slaughter of his village (which is still stupid) is if this takes place much later in his career - thus negating the point of an origin story - or if one goes through "The Tower of the Elephant," "The God in the Bowl," "Rogues in the House" et al with the belief that Conan is on his quest for vengeance. Which is simply impossible, of course: none of those stories could possibly accommodate such a motive and drive, as Conan does things which would actively hinder and lengthen this quest for vengeance for no particular reason. In addition, Conan is young when Zym comes to his village, meaning that his quest for vengeance takes years - perhaps even a decade. Did young Conan go north with the Aesir, fight Hyperboreans, get captured, and go south to Zamora as part of his "quest for vengeance?" If so, that's a lot of adventure Doppenheimer left out, and Conan went on a hell of a wild goose chase: if not, how can anyone possibly claim it's "faithful"?
But hey, let's entertain this silly idea. Let's see how we can incorporate this stupid story into Conan's life as Hoard wrote it. Remember my idea for an origin story? Let's try that out, with some elements from the Dark Storm Chronology, and Doppenheimerize it: Doppenheimer's additions in red, elements Doppenheimer use from the original Howard in blue, just so we see how much is ignored or contradicted. For the purposes of the experiment, I'm assuming that Khor Khala is on the Vilayet, somewhere just north of Turan, as it's the closest it could possibly be to Cimmeria.
Conan is born on a battlefield, during a skirmish between his clan and a band of raiding Vanir warriors. His mother dies on the battlefield. His clan is situated in Northwest Cimmeria. Cimmerians are a harsh and dark race, who inhabit a dark land. He grows up hunting mountain-beasts, felling hawks with stones, and participating in wars among other Cimmerian tribes, as well as along the Nordheim border, and fighting Picts. He grows up to become a black-haired, blue-eyed young man. His father is a blacksmith. His family teaches him of Crom and his dark race and Cimmerian theology, as well as some stuff about steel.
His grandfather is a warrior from a southern tribe who was chased out during a bloodfeud, and after long wanderings--perhaps among the Hyborian kingdoms--settled among the northwesterners. Grandfather inspires young Conan with stories of the Hyborian kingdoms far to the south, which he raided frequently when he was still among the southern Cimmerians, possibly instilling in the boy a desire to see those wonders. At the same time, the mythology of the Cimmerians gives him a healthy fear of the supernatural: ghouls, goblins, necromancers, night fiends, ghosts, hobgoblins, dwarfs, wizards and sorcerers.
At some point before he becomes a man, Conan breaks the neck of a wild Cimmerian bull with his bare hands. As a youth, Conan is so formidable a warrior that his name is repeated around the council fires of Cimmeria. Conan himself takes part in the assault of Venarium, an Aquilonian fort-town, part of an Aquilonian attempt to conquest and colonize southern Cimmeria. The Cimmerians puts aside their blood-feuds and conflicts to gather en-mass, where they annihilate the Gundermen colonists and raze Venarium to cinders. It is here that Conan may have had his first encounter with civilization, unless he visits some border town called Brigantium. (This is probably the very latest Khalar could arrive in Cimmeria, and still call Conan a "youth.")
Khalar Zym comes to Cimmeria, and slaughters Conan's home village, including his father. (Quite how Khalar got there from Khor Khala, considering the several sovereign nations in the way, as well as what happened to Venarium, is unclear) Conan flees, but vows revenge on Zym and his generals. Conan's first journey outside of his homeland is northward, where he fights alongside a group of Aesir for some time, raiding and battling Vanir and Hyperboreans. (Why was he hanging out with the Aesir when he's supposed to be on a quest for vengeance? Did he think Khalar went north or something?) On one ill-fated raid, he is captured by Hyperboreans (maybe he thought Khalar went to Hyperborea?), and his incarceration instills a lifelong hatred for them in the young warrior which affects his policies as king of Aquilonia. He escapes, and flees southwards into the Hyborian Kingdom of Brythunia, eventually heading for Nemedia (before the events of "The Tower of the Elephant," Conan is known to have experienced the civilized glories of Brythunia, Aquilonia, Nemedia and Koth: presumably this is during his "quest" to find Khalar).
It is presumably this rough time that the events of "The God in the Bowl" take place, where Conan, now a penniless thief, is after a diamond goblet. The logical way for Conan to get from Nemedia to Zamora while including Koth and Aquilonia would be Conan fleeing into Aquilonia post-"The God in the Bowl," then going south to Koth, before finally arriving in Zamora. His time in Aquilonia is presumably where he finds Lucius, unless he somehow misses him, and has to return to Aquilonia later. A year after Venarium, he finds himself at the Thief-City of Zamora. In "The Tower of the Elephant," Conan searches for a way into the titular tower to gain the Heart of the Elephant. (How does this link into his quest?) Conan soon drifts westward (why would he go west, away from Khor Khala?) to the events of the Nestor Fragment and "Rogues in the House." Eventually Conan and Murillo quit the city. The events of the Yaralet fragment may follow this, where Conan joins up with the Corinthian mercenaries before the disastrous battle. This is possibly the earliest point that Conan could travel east to Khor Khala, after months if not years of getting side-tracked.
(If you even care, not to mention if you actually think Conan won't somehow save the day)
After defeating Khalar Zym, the rest of Conan's life is ahead of him. At some points in his career, Conan returns to Cimmeria - though with his village destroyed and his family dead, it's hard to think what could possibly be there for him to return to.
So, the only way for this whole "quest to avenge the murder of his father and the slaughter of his village" is to assume that Conan's drive is not really that strong, allowing him to make several detours in the form of Howard stories, relegating those tales to "side-quests." Assuming Conan is 18 at the time the film takes place (and that's seriously stretching things, since I get the distinct impression he's supposed to be in his twenties and possibly even early thirties) his quest for revenge will have taken three years. This utterly ruins the sense of urgency in the quest, and makes a mockery of the Howard stories.
The only way this could even start to be faithful to Robert E. Howard is if that sentence currently serving as "plot synopsis" at the IMDB is changed. Sad to say, I don't see that as a possibility.