A ripping SF-fantasy-adventure fraught with dinosaurs, barbarians, Transformers, heavy metal, monsters, spaceships, and all manner of madness.
Sunday, 17 April 2011
This is why I have the "What In Blazes" tag
What we have here is a pornographic parody of Star Trek: The Next Generation.
What we also have here is one of the most logic-defying situations I can think of: a pornographic motion picture with a plot that sounds more interesting than the last three official Star Trek films combined.
Watch the video: despite it being ostensibly for a pornographic film, it's completely worksafe. I have no idea how that happened.
Full disclosure: I'm a Trekkie. No, I'm not the kind of Trekkie that pulls a hissy fit if you call him a Trekkie or a Trekker or any other nomenclature that seems entirely arbitrary. I am, however, the kind of Trekkie who can recall the episodes in which Data's cat was male and which were female; the kind of Trekkie who got into 4th place on Fifteen-to-Trek at Scotland's largest Star Trek convention; the kind of Trekkie who probably would dress up as a Klingon if he set his mind to it.
So yes, I like my Star Trek. That interest has fallen by the wayside in recent years as Trek's product has deteriorated, from the disappointing final seasons of Voyager (though Seven of Nine was a great shot in the arm: eye-candy my eye) to the cascading films, the anaemic Enterprise, and finally culminating in Enterprising Young Men.* Then again, given the quality of what passed for Trek at that point, who could blame them for wanting to do something different?
So it's with a mixture of pathos and bewilderment that I actually find Star Trek: The Next Generation: A XXX Parody more intriguing than anything Trek in a long time. I can almost understand the idea of the effects being better than the 1980s, especially the phasers. I can even understand the sets and props being not too incomparable. But the idea that the plot of a XXX movie is more interesting than actual Star Trek is utterly perplexing.
See, STTNGAXXXP isn't just a parody: it's a parody that respects canon. The story, so far as I can tell, centres around the return of Tasha Yar, whose body was discovered in stasis on a planet. The crew reacting to the rediscovery of Tasha is entirely in-keeping with how you'd expect with Trek lore, as they come to terms with meeting a woman they believed long dead, as well as tying into "Yesterday's Enterprise" (one of the finest pieces of Trek, even science fiction television as a whole) and other episodes. There's even allusions to Troi and Riker's past, Data's intimacy with Tasha, Picard and Beverly's unresolved tension, and freaking Sela turns up in a Romulan Warbird.
What the hell kind of crazy universe is this when the storyline of an explicit skin flick is more interesting to me than multi-million dollar movies?
The strangest thing is, I can easily see this film getting a "mainstream" release. In 2005, the film Pirates XXX was so well-regarded that the filmmakers actually produced an R-rated version (called, simply, Pirates). The makers of this pornographic motion picture were so proud of the acting, writing and production values that they cut the more explicit scenes out. This is a sentence I don't think I ever thought I would type.
After all, in a world where a Trek/Babylon 5 crossover made by five friends can become an internet sensation, former stars can make their own Trek films, and popular fan series can guest star members of the original series, why shouldn't an edited XXX parody of Trek with an interesting plot and impressive effects gain an audience?
*Yes, one of these days I'll have to explain my problems with Abrams' Star Trek in full, but doing that sort of thing justice takes time. You can't just leap into it.
"...a parody that respects canon."
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do-wDPoC6GM
Tex
(I'll explain later)
For that ten minutes of intriguing plot, you have to sit through eighty minutes of fairly tedious sex. Brad Jones already went over the problem with nearly all these "xxx parody" films (that don't even have the imagination to come up with a suitable porn title like Sex Trek or somesuch): the parody's just on the side. Most of it is repetitive close-ups of people sweating and grunting.
ReplyDeleteAs for "Pirates" (R-rated version)...it just wasn't that good. Lots of runny eyeliner, fake breasts, and bad acting. Umm...huzzah?
*Yes, one of these days I'll have to explain my problems with Abrams' Star Trek in full, but doing that sort of thing justice takes time. You can't just leap into it.
ReplyDeleteYes, one of these days you ought to do this, because I'd like confirmation that I'm not alone is disliking Abrams's film.
Hah, well, when it comes to Doctor Who I suppose anything can be canon!
ReplyDeleteFor that ten minutes of intriguing plot, you have to sit through eighty minutes of fairly tedious sex. Brad Jones already went over the problem with nearly all these "xxx parody" films (that don't even have the imagination to come up with a suitable porn title like Sex Trek or somesuch): the parody's just on the side. Most of it is repetitive close-ups of people sweating and grunting.
In my defense, I don't think I've ever seen one of these. I haven't seen Pirates, frinstance.
Yes, one of these days you ought to do this, because I'd like confirmation that I'm not alone is disliking Abrams's film.
I can see why the film was so popular and liked, I just wasn't one of those guys dazzled by the lens flares and fanservice. Plus there are plot holes, and then there are plot HOOOOOLES.
The story looks fairly interesting. Troy was cute, which is a nice change.
ReplyDeleteTrekkies like porn?! Who would have guessed?!!
ReplyDelete;)
I'm not sure, but it seems like the demographic might have considerable overlap.
Anyway, I had never heard of New Voyages or Gods and Men, so I'm very grateful to find out about those! :)
Al, now you HAVE to begin work on a post about Jar-Jar Abrams' Star Trek 90210.
ReplyDeleteTex
(it is your destiny)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yd0j97RhZUQ
The story looks fairly interesting. Troy was cute, which is a nice change.
ReplyDeleteHey! Marina Sirtis was one of my first crushes! Even if it turned out the real person wasn't anything like the fictional character, which is one of the most disillusioning moments of my life. Not least because I preferred the character...
I'm not sure, but it seems like the demographic might have considerable overlap.
I'm not one of them. I'm rather weird about pornography. I tend to prefer erotica. I'm such a big girl...
Al, now you HAVE to begin work on a post about Jar-Jar Abrams' Star Trek 90210.
Tex
(it is your destiny)
Destiny! You cannot escape... MY... Destiny! (now I want a Trekformers crossover!)
Still, I'm glad I'm not the only one to notice the Star Wars similarities.
i cant belive how much it looks(and behaves ) like the show! hilarious!my brother is a big star trek fan gotta tell him about this.on a foot note Al i always felt that true trek died around the third or fourth season of tng, with the advent of the borg.-Mario
ReplyDeleteon a foot note Al i always felt that true trek died around the third or fourth season of tng, with the advent of the borg.-Mario
ReplyDeleteI think that's about my opinion too. That was around the time of Star Trek VI, too.
Deep Space Nine was an excellent show, but to me, it was alternate-Trek in a number of ways - not necessarily bad or inferior, just different. Voyager had a couple of fantastic episodes, but again, alternate-Trek.
Al,
ReplyDeleteThere is a Ghostbusters/Star Trek/Transformers/ GIJOE/Zombies Crossover in progress right now from IDW...